5 facts on link building

 
June 15th, 2006 - Filed under Link Building by Cristian Mezei
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
| 30,769 views
 

A lot of people asked me tons of questions in the past few months.

I’m gonna’ state some of them here, with the relevant answer that I would offer/offered :

Q1: I submitted my website to $#223@@ directories. Why is my PR only 4 ?

A: Web directories are a good way to build some links to your website, but they are not a high PR source. Only a few old, quality and established web directories have enough PR on their index page so that it can transfer PR to the category in which your website actually resides. Most of the usual day to day directories don’t even have PR on their third level.

You can only go to a PR5 or a PR6, as a maximum level IMHO, with a LOT of hard work, and by submitting your website to all the damn directories available worldwide, including DMOZ, Yahoo, Business.com, Microsoft SBD, Joeant and all the other great ones.

Web directory submissions are great as a starter action, to get your website indexed and to receive some keyword anchor weight for your website.

Q2: My website has a PR7 on it’s index. I have so much valuable and unique content. Why do my competitor’s websites outrank me ? My website is also older than theirs. One of my competitors has his website for a year. The other one has his website only one month ago.

A: First of all, please disregard PR when we are discussing search results ranking. Pagerank is just a result of your link building, primarily a results of your inbound links’s pagerank. It’s not a ranking factor.

The real answer is: Anchor text. What’s an anchor ? It’s this part of a text link :

[[code]]czo0OTpcIjxhIGhyZWY9XCJodHRwOi8vd3d3Lm15ZG9tYWluLmNvbVwiPkFuY2hvciB0ZXh0PC9hPlwiO3tbJiomXX0=[[/code]]

It’s been so long (years) since original and unique content was king. Now all the major (Google emphases the anchor’s importance even more) search engines count the anchor text of an incoming link as the major ranking factor when ranking websites in their results.

As for your competitors… The one with the 1 year old domain, may be ranking higher than you because he has a lot of links towards his website/pages with an optimized anchor text.

If you optimize for green widgets, and you have links towards you with the anchor text blue frogs you’re nowhere near the top 50 results, guaranteed.

One other important fact about anchors: they are so important that i could get a blank page (o bytes) #1 in the search results, for any 20 mil. results keyword, if i have enough links pointing to the page, with a specific anchor.

Please note that a blue widgets link anchor will not count as much (actually it will count a hell of a lot less) as a widgets link anchor, if you want to optimize for widgets. So use the exact same keyword or keyphrase that you want to optimize for. Don’t just stick a lot of keywords in an anchor. It won’t do you good at all.

The competitor with the one month old website will be out of the top search results in one month or so, don’t worry. Every new website gets an extraordinary boost in Google, for the first 1-2 months, and then drops way low. If the owner slowly builds quality links towards it, and maintains the quality content, it will slowly grow in the SERPS over the next 6 to 12 months.

Q3: How the heck can I get more links ? I’ve done all I can do.

A: First of all, the art of link building is not just about buying links, doing link exchanges and submitting to article or web directories.

Actually those are the worst links you can get :). The best links are those natural links, gained from people who seen a quality resource, post, advice, tool, article and so on, on your website.

My advice to you : stop building/promoting websites for the search engines and think more about the visitors. Write controversial articles, interesting stories, good advices, offer a free service, put up a contest and so on. Stuff that helps and enlightens people.

Q4: Are those .edu and .gov links really that much more important ?

A: Well, yes. As a DMOZ link (since most of the DMOZ editors and other web users try to explain people that it’s not just like that, have a look at The ODP effect on search engines in Resource Zone) is much more important than a normal weblink, so is a link from an .edu or .gov website.

You’ll ask why ? Tell me when was the last time you saw a web directory/mortgage/replica watches/casino/insurance page on one of those TLD’s ?

I for one have seen a few, but those are really rare exceptions and end up been banned right away. Here’s a .edu directory spam case (which I described some time ago) that got banned, and here’s some other example of .edu domains getting spammed (and who lack maintenance).

It’s for this reason (the very low percentage of .edu and .gov domains that have spam on them) that Google places a much higher importance of a reference from there to your website.

In most cases, .edu and .gov domains have a very high PR too (they get heavy, quality high PR linkage), so that’s why most spammers haunt them and try new automated ways to spam, each day.

Q5: I keep doing a lot of site-wide links. Is that good ?

A: NO. Site-wides were extremly nice methods of gaining weight for certain keywords or keyphrases in the past. With today’s algorithms, you will loose a lot with site-wides. From indexed pages to rank in the search results.

If someone who owns a PR6 website with 100.000 indexed pages wants to offer you a site-wide links for free, just refuse it. If he can offer you a link only from the index page (and 2-3 other pages) than you’re a happy bastard. If not, decline to offer.

I would only recommend a site-wide, if all the links you will get from that website (count 1 IBL for 5 indexed pages) do not exceed 20% of your unique natural inbound links.

Submit your business or company to Webxperience! and Webotopia directories.
If you found this post useful please Subscribe with Bloglines Add to Technorati Favorites (new windows)
Tags: none
 

16 Comments so far

Janos said:
June 16th, 2006

Thanks for the great article. However, this SEO thing still looks like black magic for me. :-)

June 16th, 2006

This is why I post such articles. So that people can learn new stuff :)

Go ahead. Dig in.

bobby said:
June 16th, 2006

I agree with you on all counts.

I have the same problem when talking about PR: explaining that SE relevancy has nothing to do with the PR of your site (or page, for that matter).

Boon Leong said:
October 25th, 2006

I think that site-wide links do work. If you get a site wide link with a PR6 site and it is related to your topic, go for it. You don’t have to worry about the sudden 100,000 pages increase because it is not going to be reindex by google so fast. It takes time to reindex sites, so it should be quite safe. And that fact that you have the same subject/interest, it’s good for SERPs.

However, if that PR6 site is no related, then I agree, don’t go for it. It may do more harm than good.

October 25th, 2006

Boon, it’s the unique/site-wide links ratio that matters too.

If you have 10 site-wide links (totaling the links of 10 websites and all their pages) and only 10-15 unique links, it’s very bad.

if you have let’s say 1 site-wide, for each 20-30 unique links, that’s acceptable and it will work.

Zoltan said:
October 25th, 2006

Cristian,

“I would only recommend a site-wide, if all the links you will get from that website (count 1 IBL for 5 indexed pages) do not exceed 20% of your unique natural inbound links.”

This 20% is just a personal opinion, or do you read it somewhere else as well?

Will it hurt to put sitewide links on a site with hundreds of pages? If this is the case, one can easily cause problem to competition just by heavily linking to them? Please comment.

October 25th, 2006

This 20% is just a personal opinion, or do you read it somewhere else as well?

It’s a personal guideline, based on my experience. I always make tests and observe websites and it comes with the territory. Link analytics and research on your own websites always helps too. Always watch your progress in the SERPS, experiment, change things. That’s how you gain knowledge.

If this is the case, one can easily cause problem to competition just by heavily linking to them? Please comment.

If someone wanted to get a relatively new website (0 6 months) nowhere in the SERPs (I’m not talking banned; just penalized for rank) in the past, he just had to put a 30.000 weight ad in the DP Co-op weight towards that website. I did that.

Altough many other experienced guys will tell you that this doesn’t always work.

dave said:
November 7th, 2006

Cristain, You mentioned above to get links with the exact same anchor text you are trying to rank for

“So use the exact same keyword or keyphrase that you want to optimize for.”

I thought that was a red flag now if its a two word term. Am I wrong??

I have been mixing it up to be the two word term included in three and four word anchors.

November 7th, 2006

I thought that was a red flag now if its a two word term. Am I wrong??

Yeah man. Just use 1-2-3-4 or X words in the anchor.

dave said:
November 7th, 2006

One more question for ya. What is your opinion on this…

Do you think their is a waiting period for links to have an effect on ranking? Also, if yes or no, is that an opinion or do you see proof one way or the other?

November 7th, 2006

As soon as the page that hold your links is indexed, that link will count. No matter if it shows or not in Google’s link: operator.

The problem is, that the more stable the link is , the more trust it offers your domain.

In this moment I have a very difficult fever (39 Celsius) so It’s har to find any other proof. It’s just my experience.

dave said:
November 7th, 2006

Some say that it takes a couple months of the link being live/indexed for it to have an affect….thanks for you take on the subject.

Get Some Rest.

JameSEO said:
January 11th, 2008

I really like the way you look at link building… props!

April 9th, 2008

Interesting post. I’ve been into link building for a while now and anchor text is one of the most important methods of increasing web traffic and search engine rankings.

Suhrud said:
May 3rd, 2008

ya, I have experienced it!

With good logical use of relative keywords in anchor of a backlink, can boost the actual target page in Google. I had to promote a article on weight gaining which was already live and indexed but didnt had much traffic. After doing a research on relative keywords and their popularity with respect to competition, I managed to found a good keyword term which I used in a backlink.

Results: The target page is getting ranked for this new relative keyword term [though not at all within the actual targeted page] and the web page owner is now enjoying the new channel of traffic!

September 12th, 2008

Ya great article and thanks for these quality tips.I agree that submitting URL to the directories and link exchanges are not natural SEO techniques. Natural links comes from your readers,only if you write quality content for them.

Leave a reply

Allowed tags (XHTML): <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

RSS Readers & Technorati:

My Subscribers Add to Technorati Favorites
View Cristian Mezei's profile on LinkedIn

Subscribe & Syndication:

RSS Feed at FeedBurner NewsGator Google Bloglines My MSN Add to My Yahoo! Add to FeedLounge Add to My AOL Add to NetVibes Add to NewsBurst Add to Pluck Add to NewsIsFree

Updates by e-mail:

My Blogroll:

Blogs & Forums (RO)

Blogs & Websites

Official Blogs

Social Websites
Powered by Bloglines

Tag Cosmos: Top Tags